Duolingo – the gamified language-learning app with its infamous owl mascot – has charmed millions of users with its promise of making language acquisition easy and fun. But if you’re serious about learning Chinese, let me save you some wasted time: Duolingo is not the tool for the job.
When you talk to people about learning languages and you mention apps, the first name that comes up is often Duolingo. A bit like McDonald’s comes up first in fast food. Often these people have no idea what apps are out there, let alone know which ones best suit their learning goals. These people are an easy target for Duolingo. An app that claims to be “free, fun, and effective” for all world languages, to train speaking, listening, reading and writing and to build “real-world communication skills”.
I have to admit that I haven’t been using Duolingo for very long. I’ve had the app on my phone several times, only to delete it after a short while with a nasty aftertaste. But I’ve seen enough to know what’s wrong with it, especially when it comes to Chinese.
1. The tonal nightmare: Duolingo ignores Chinese’s core difficulty
Chinese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or intonation you use when pronouncing a word can completely change its meaning. For example, you probably know that the syllable “ma” can mean “mother” (妈妈), “horse” (马), “scold” (骂), or even just serve as a question marker (吗), depending on the tone.
Duolingo, however, barely addresses this fundamental aspect of the language. It offers no structured explanation of tones, no systematic tone drills and minimal feedback on tone accuracy. The app might occasionally prompt you to repeat phrases aloud, but without detailed tonal analysis or correction, you’re left guessing if you’re saying the right thing – or if you’ve just accidentally insulted someone’s mother.
For a language where tonal accuracy can make or break comprehension, this is unforgivable. Duolingo’s approach treats Chinese like a “plug-and-play” European language, which it simply is not. Learners who ignore this fact will live to regret it, because tones are simply too important.
2. A romanization trap: pinyin overload without progress
Duolingo relies heavily on Pinyin, the Romanized system for representing Chinese pronunciation. While Pinyin is a useful tool for beginners, it’s meant to be a stepping stone – not a crutch. Unfortunately, Duolingo never forces learners to graduate to reading Chinese characters (汉字), which are the backbone of the written language.
This over-reliance on Pinyin prevents learners from developing essential skills. Chinese characters carry semantic and cultural nuances that Pinyin cannot capture. For instance, the character “爱” (love) contains parts that convey deeper meanings about the word’s origins and context. Duolingo’s neglect of characters leaves learners stranded in a shallow understanding of the language, unable to read even basic signs or menus in Chinese.
By contrast, serious Chinese learners know that mastering characters is a must. Duolingo’s refusal to prioritize them is like trying to learn English by memorizing how words sound without ever learning to spell.
3. Addictive gamification, no real progress
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: Duolingo’s gamification. While its streaks, badges, and XP points might keep you glued to your phone, they create an illusion of progress without delivering real results. You might feel accomplished when you’ve completed a “5-day streak” or earned a new badge, but that dopamine hit doesn’t translate into actual language acquisition.
In the case of Chinese, this gamified approach is especially damaging. Instead of focusing on building core skills like listening comprehension, speaking fluency or character recognition, Duolingo’s bite-sized lessons prioritize quick taps and multiple-choice questions that barely scratch the surface. Worse, the app’s algorithms often recycle the same simple phrases ad nauseam (“I eat rice” and “He drinks tea”), giving learners a false sense of mastery while they’re actually stagnating at a beginner level.
The app’s addictive design stimulates a kind of mindless repetition, consuming valuable time you could spend on more effective methods like real immersion, structured classes, graded readers and character study.
4. No real grammar instruction
Chinese grammar is refreshingly simple compared to European languages, but it still has unique structures that require explanation and practice. For example, Chinese uses word order to indicate grammatical relationships, and it has no verb conjugations or plural forms.
Duolingo, however, tends to avoid teaching grammar altogether. Instead of explaining sentence structures, it forces users to memorize phrases through sheer repetition. The result? Learners are left confused when faced with even slightly complex sentences. For instance, without guidance, how would a beginner know that “他站在桥上” (“He stands on the bridge”) follows a specific spatial structure that’s intrinsic to Chinese? Duolingo doesn’t bother to explain.
This lack of grammatical clarity sets learners up for failure. You might be able to parrot a few basic phrases, but you’ll struggle to build sentences or communicate effectively in real-world situations.
5. Listening and speaking
If you’re learning Chinese, listening and speaking should be top priorities. Chinese pronunciation is notoriously tricky for non-native speakers, with subtle distinctions between sounds that can trip up even seasoned learners. For example, the difference between “sh” and “s”, or between “j” and “zh,” requires focused practice to master.
Duolingo’s listening exercises are laughably inadequate. The app provides no contextual listening practice or meaningful feedback. Speaking exercises, meanwhile, are rare and overly simplistic. Even when they do appear, the app’s speech recognition technology is not very reliable, often failing to catch obvious mistakes.
6. Unrealistic vocabulary and phrase choices
Duolingo’s Chinese course focuses on vocabulary and phrases that are often irrelevant to everyday life. Sure, it’s amusing to learn how to say “The panda eats an apple” (熊猫吃苹果), but when was the last time you needed that in a real conversation? Meanwhile, essential survival phrases like “Where is the bathroom?” (卫生间在哪里？) or “How much does this cost?” (这个多少钱？) are buried deep in the course or ignored entirely.
Serious learners need practical vocabulary that reflects real-world needs, not cartoonish scenarios about pandas and apples. Duolingo’s misaligned priorities waste your time and leave you ill-equipped for genuine communication.
7. The ethics of wasting users’ time
Duolingo’s biggest flaw isn’t just its ineffectiveness – it’s the way the app exploits users’ time and attention while delivering almost no tangible progress. The gamified design keeps you hooked, feeding you a steady stream of superficial tasks that feel rewarding but ultimately lead nowhere. It’s like running on a treadmill: you expend energy but never get closer to your destination.
For a language as challenging and nuanced as Chinese, this is not just unhelpful – it’s unethical. Duolingo markets itself as a legitimate learning tool, but for Chinese learners, it’s little more than a time sink. Imagine spending hundreds of hours tapping through Duolingo lessons, only to realize you can’t hold a basic conversation or read a single street sign in Chinese. That’s not just disappointing; it’s infuriating.
The bottom line
Don’t get me wrong: Duolingo isn’t completely without value. In fact, it’s one of the most well-developed language learning apps available, and its affordability is a major plus. I’m also a big fan of its gamified approach, which helps making learning more fun and engaging. However, where Duolingo falls short is in the idea that it can provide everything – i.e. speaking, listening, reading, and writing – needed to master a language.
For Chinese in particular, Duolingo offers little more than an introduction to the language, which can certainly be helpful to some extent. But it’s unrealistic to think that spending 15 minutes a day on the app will have you speaking fluently or understanding Chinese news if you just keep at it.
To be fair, it’s unreasonable to expect any single app to deliver a complete language learning experience. Apps like Duolingo are best seen as tools to complement more substantial learning activities. However, the bite-sized lessons Duolingo provides are often too brief and fragmented to lay a solid foundation for real progress. Duolingo would do well to temper expectations in its marketing. It should focus on positioning itself as a helpful tool rather than a standalone solution.
If you’re serious about learning Chinese, I’d suggest to skip Duolingo. Instead, invest your time in proven methods: enroll in a structured class, hire a qualified tutor, immerse yourself in Chinese media, practice shadowing and dedicate time to learning characters and tones. For example, you might use platforms like Italki to find professional tutors or Skritter to practice writing Chinese characters. Textbooks like “Integrated Chinese” or “HSK Standard Course” can provide a strong foundation in grammar and vocabulary, while language exchange programs or apps like HelloTalk offer opportunities to practice speaking with native speakers.
To wrap it up: don’t let a flashy app waste your valuable learning time. Chinese is one of the most beautiful and complex languages in the world, and it demands a serious, thoughtful approach. Duolingo might work for some languages or as a ‘free trial’ to the Chinese language, but when it comes to building fluency in Chinese, it’s a distraction at best.
Never miss a post from Kaohongshu
Affiliate links
Disclosure: These are affiliate links. They help me to support this blog, meaning, at no additional cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase.
